Go to article

INTO THE VOID

Questions and Answers

 

Kim: The diagram implies there is a one > one > one > many relationship – but my instinct tells me this is not the case

A: the diagram is a very simplistic(!) view and on this level, yes, it is as you describe. However when these energies are contemplated and understanding gained through inner knowing my realisation is it is not so; I am trying to convey in intellectual, left brained, terms understandings that have been gained by intuitive means. However the left brained, intellectual mind is equally important for if the logical mind/ego understands then it is able to let go and allow intuitive understanding to develop through direct experience of these energies. This is why your questions are important. Through intellectual analysis we enable the personality(s) to understand concepts that are truly beyond the boundaries of physical expression. However too much intellectualising may suffocate inner knowing so, as with all things, a balance has to be maintained where contemplation of the intellectual, through the process of surrender, enables spontaneous inner knowing to arise and direct understanding of the principles outlined in my original article. 

Kim: Can a Personality Consciousness belong to more than one Soul Group?   

A: the short answer to this is ‘no’. My understanding is a single soul has multiple personalities through which it may find expression and gain insight into different perspectives within a given reality. However each soul will itself be a part of a group consciousness and through this connection the personality indeed belongs to more than one soul group. If we take ‘Know Thyself’ as an example, you and I may be personality expressions of the same soul, Jenny and Nick maybe expressions of another soul and Chris an expression of yet another. As personalities we have formed a physical group which has the potential to develop into group consciousness on this physical level. Our conscious intention not only manifests on this level but also expands to include that of soul groups and even monadic groups.  

If we turn this on its head and view our little group from the perspective of the monad we can see how these three souls along with their associated personalities (you, me, Jenny, Nick and Chris) provide infinite perspectives on reality through which this great being may ‘know itself’.  The enormity of this potential is realised when we also take into the equation the many connections and groups to which we each belong.

In the case of you and I or Jenny and Nick, in the example given above, where two or more members from the same soul group meet consciously on this physical level I believe there to be an expression/intention/potential for particular soul/monad group purpose to be actuated. In other words the group has formed for a particular purpose. In the case of group initiation I believe the evolution of the personalities in actuating this purpose facilitates initiation of the group soul into a higher vibration of awareness. 

Kim: Can a Soul Group belong to more than one Monad? 

A: I believe I have answered this one above. It’s similar but at a higher level of vibration. 

Kim: Or is it only the Personality Consciousness that is fragmented and so can belong to more than one Personality Group?  

A: in truth all that lies within this realm of duality is fragmented to some extent, it is simply a question of degree. The personality consciousness is particularly fragmented through its own lack of awareness. Souls/monads may form particular groups in accordance with divine will as do personalities, the only difference being one is conscious and the other is not.  

Kim: I do hope I have not missed the point somewhere along the line and that these are not really stupid questions?!  

A: this is the easiest one to answer! There are no stupid questions and there is no point to be missed! 

Kim: I’d be interested to know if and how the personality consciousness that is still not ‘awakened’ in a soul group may make personality groupings that would lead to this awakening and the potential remapping of the model.   

A: now here is a leading question! The personality may not be awake but the soul is! It continues to place situations in the life of the personality until it wakes up and takes notice. Consider how we met, and how Chris, Jenny and Nick (and Sue and Liz) all came together that we may form ‘know thyself’. Soul dynamics and divine will was definitely at play here. We each knew/felt a connection with each other and were brought into contact through a group we no longer have connections with. Even though it may not be a fulfilment of soul purpose to be ‘MITL’ facilitators we all had to go through the motions of being in that particular group for a higher purpose to be revealed. So I guess what it comes down to is, until you are fully awake, follow your heart and do what feels right. On a lower, solar plexus, level this would be to follow your gut instincts. Eventually you will end up where you are meant to be and with the group(s) you are meant to be serving with (this may or may not be physical groups). 

Kim: Do you see the grouping as dynamic or fundamentally fixed to a ‘divine mapping’? 

A: there is definitely a divine mapping. The entire universe is structured as we know from the study and contemplation of sacred geometry; however this structure is dynamic. It is a structure where infinite possibilities exist in each moment in accordance with divine will, where every choice we make in this reality directly impacts all, from the smallest of atoms to the highest vibrations of light; however as mentioned in the article there is divine and natural order in all of it.  

I know I am supposed to be ‘feeling my water aspect’ but I first have to get the air out of my head so sorry for being so detached for now! 

As mentioned above, you will not be able to embrace your ‘water’ intuitive level until your ‘head’ is satisfied, so keep asking the questions! 

Copyright 2009 ©Barbara Rose. All rights reserved.

  NEWS Contact and Directions  |  About Barbara Rose  |   Links                           Copyright 2008 © Barbara Rose.